The following is an unedited story we received recounting one person’s experience with The Devil’s Tree in Oak Hammock Park. We do not know the storyteller in person and can neither confirm nor deny the statements made in this tale of the paranormal. We are posting the full story in order to allow you to judge the contents for yourself.

We looked up directions for the tree and headed to the park at around 7:30p.m. When we reached the park we went through the wooded area and not the actual park.

As soon as I stepped foot into the woods my legs began to shook and I was starting to regret the whole thing. After a few minutes we all collected ourselves, calmed down our nerves and stepped onto the dark, overgrown path. Through the first set of woods it was very calm and we began cracking jokes and were very at ease. After about twenty minutes of being completely lost we came out of the woods and found the canal. Nothing was out of the ordinary except for the clanking of chains we heard from time to time. It was a calm warm night and we weren’t very scared at all….. until we came to the mounds. From there on it felt like we were being perpetually watched.

We wove our way through the path men up front (of course) and the girls holding hands keeping up the rear. All of a sudden the three of us in back halted. It was like a wall was blocking our way. Our knees buckled simultaneously, but we didn’t say a word. The boys hadn’t noticed and kept walking ahead. Out of no where a screeching sound like an animal in mortal danger filled the air. Then it got silent. My sister was earnestly whispering for us to go back, but the boys were not concerned. The air kept getting heavier and the scariest feelings came over me. Then my sister’s fiance walked a little forward and confirmed our suspicions, “It’s the tree”. He was so dumb as to touch the tree, and from then on it got worse.

Trying to be as professional as we could we turned around and as we started walking the flashlight went out. [Its like we weren't getting a freaking break]. My sister said that she felt like something was hovering on her shoulder and she couldn’t get it off. I had the feeling of an evil presence skulking by me and everything was screaming get out. We just all knew we weren’t supposed to be there, nothing good was there.

Panicking we hurried to get out of the trail. We finally got the the flashlight to work again and we walked as fast as we could out of there. As soon as we got to the canal again we were somewhat relieved and the presence was gone.

This is a true story of skeptics turned to believers.

It was honestly the worst experience of my life. I can never doubt the paranormal again.

While many ‘Ghost Hunting’ groups across the world rely on certain items, their use outside their intended field might seem odd to the average person. One of those items is the EMF Meter, a device that measures the electromagnetic field at a given location. There are websites out there which will tell you that using meters such as the EMF are ‘shady science,’ taking an item not intended for this use and claiming scientific results from the readings. We obviously don’t agree with these critics, but wanted to share the reason for our difference of opinion.

Electric fields are created by differences in voltage: the higher the voltage, the stronger will be the resultant field. Magnetic fields are created when electric current flows: the greater the current, the stronger the magnetic field. An electric field will exist even when there is no current flowing. If current does flow, the strength of the magnetic field will vary with power consumption but the electric field strength will be constant. (Extract from “Electromagnetic Fields”, published by the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe in 1999)

Electromagnetic fields are all around us. Fields are produced by the local build-up of electric charges in the atmosphere associated with thunderstorms, and the earth’s magnetic field is what causes a compass needle to find North. It is even used by birds and fish for navigation. These fields can also be discharged from power lines, home wiring, airport and military radar, substations, transformers, computers and appliances.

One of the main characteristics which defines an electromagnetic field (EMF) is its frequency or its corresponding wavelength. Fields of different frequencies interact with the body in different ways. One can imagine electromagnetic waves as series of very regular waves that travel at an enormous speed, the speed of light. The frequency simply describes the number of oscillations or cycles per second, while the term wavelength describes the distance between one wave and the next. Hence wavelength and frequency are inseparably intertwined: the higher the frequency the shorter the wavelength.

A simple analogy should help to illustrate the concept: Tie a long rope to a door handle and keep hold of the free end. Moving it up and then down slowly will generate a single big wave; more rapid motion will generate a whole series of small waves. The length of the rope remains constant, therefore, the more waves you generate (higher frequency) the smaller will be the distance between them (shorter wavelength).

Wavelength and frequency determine another important characteristic of electromagnetic fields: Electromagnetic waves are carried by particles called quanta. Quanta of higher frequency (shorter wavelength) waves carry more energy than lower frequency (longer wavelength) fields. Some electromagnetic waves carry so much energy per quantum that they have the ability to break bonds between molecules. In the electromagnetic spectrum, gamma rays given off by radioactive materials, cosmic rays and X-rays carry this property and are called ‘ionizing radiation’. Fields whose quanta are insufficient to break molecular bonds are called ‘non-ionizing radiation’. Man-made sources of electromagnetic fields that form a major part of industrialized life – electricity, microwaves and radiofrequency fields – are found at the relatively long wavelength and low frequency end of the electromagnetic spectrum and their quanta are unable to break chemical bonds.

Electric fields exist whenever a positive or negative electrical charge is present. They exert forces on other charges within the field. The strength of the electric field is measured in volts per metre (V/m). Any electrical wire that is charged will produce an associated electric field. This field exists even when there is no current flowing. The higher the voltage, the stronger the electric field at a given distance from the wire.

Electric fields are strongest close to a charge or charged conductor, and their strength rapidly diminishes with distance from it. Conductors such as metal shield them very effectively. Other materials, such as building materials and trees, provide some shielding capability. Therefore, the electric fields from power lines outside the house are reduced by walls, buildings, and trees. When power lines are buried in the ground, the electric fields at the surface are hardly detectable.

Magnetic fields arise from the motion of electric charges. The strength of the magnetic field is measured in amperes per meter (A/m); more commonly in electromagnetic field research, scientists specify a related quantity, the flux density (in microtesla, µT) instead. In contrast to electric fields, a magnetic field is only produced once a device is switched on and current flows. The higher the current, the greater the strength of the magnetic field.

Like electric fields, magnetic fields are strongest close to their origin and rapidly decrease at greater distances from the source. Magnetic fields are not blocked by common materials such as the walls of buildings.

In November 1989, the Department of Energy reported that, “It has now become generally accepted that there are, indeed, biological effects due to field exposure.” Because of this (and many other) findings, it became necessary for individuals to have access to a simple tool that would measure the electromagnetic fields they came in contact with. Thus the birth of the reasonably priced, high quality EMF meter.

The gauss, abbreviated as G, is the cgs unit of magnetic field (B), named after the German mathematician and physicist Carl Friedrich Gauss.

An EMF meter is a type of Gauss Meter. Inside an EMF meter is a coil of thin wire that usually has hundreds of turns in it. When the meter is on, the magnetic field radiates through the coil and inducing a current. The current is amplified by the circuitry inside the Gauss meter, which measures its strength. EMF meters vary in the strength of the magnetic field they can measure and vary widely in price and accuracy. Meters have either a single axis coil or a triple axis coil. Single axis meters are much simpler than triple axis meters to manufacture and thus, are less expensive.

To use a single axis meter you must point the meter’s one sensor in three directions — -the x, y and z axis. Then, you combine the three readings in a mathematical equation to calculate the combined field strength. Obviously, its far easier and more accurate to use a 3-axis meter. Triple axis Gauss meters are quite accurate, but they are also more expensive.

Here at the GRIM society we use a single axis ELF meter (ELF stands for extremely low field) with a range of 0.1mG to 199.9 milligauss and an accuracy of ±(4% + 3digits) at 50-60 Hz. Single axis meters have the advantage when attempting to trace a linear source!

Now you might find yourself wondering what all this has to do with hunting down paranormal activity, and we have the answer. It can be found in numerous scientific studies, but there is one in particular that we like to cite, a piece published in the British Journal of Psychology in May of 2003.

In his article, “An investigation into alleged ‘hauntings’,” Prof Richard Wiseman discovered an interesting phenomenon, as explained in the excerpt below:

“Thirdly, both experiments also examined whether the alleged haunting may be due, at least in part, to participants responding to environmental cues. In Expt 1, the variance of the local magnetic ?field in the ‘haunted’ areas was significantly greater than of the ‘control’ areas. In addition, the number of unusual experiences reported by participants was higher, as correlated with magnetic variance. This was not replicated in Expt 2, which found a significant positive correlation between magnetic variance and the haunted order. These results provide some support for the controversial theory that the presence of certain types of local magnetic ?fields may impact upon a range of psychological, psychophysiological and health-related variables.”

Now, unlike many groups out there, we don’t believe that fluctuating EMF readings is proof of, well, anything other than fluctuating EMF readings. However, because there is in fact a scientific basis that shows a correlation between fluctuating EMF readings and an increase in the experience of paranormal activity, we feel that examining and recording these fluctuations are an integral part of any true exploration into the paranormal. In fact, the readings themselves can be, at times, classified as paranormal- especially in situations when there is no obvious or logical explanation for fluctuations in the field.

It is important to remember, though, that like many other things in our field of research, the correlation between EMF readings and ‘ghostly haunts’ remains speculative at this point in time.

Will The Real Devil’s Tree Please Stand Up

We finally got a chance to revisit Oak Hammock Park, with the goal of finding the ‘real’ Devil’s Tree.  Armed with information provided by actual witnesses to the events which took place in the past, we were fairly confident we could locate the actual tree.

From our own research, we knew that the tree was carved with a cross and later a wooden cross was nailed to the tree.  Our group was a little surprised that, after setting out on the adventure, it took only about four minutes to find the oak.  It was exactly at the location described by our witness.  We found a scar in the bark from the original carving and also located nails and remnants of wood from the cross.

Unfortunately, the tree has become a local oddity and has reached true urban legend status, as mentioned in our previous posts.  Rumors of occult rituals being held at the tree, a group of clergy performing a blessing on the oak and even a suicide committed underneath its branches have led to an overwhelming number of people attempting to visit the tree after dark.  After a prolonged discussion, our group decided that it would be in the best interest of Parks and Recreation (and of the tree) to not reveal the location publicly.  Ultimately, the location is where two young women died horrific deaths and later a despondent man took his own life.  It is an area that should be treated with a sense of respect and not turned into a circus sideshow.

We can tell  you that the many directions posted throughout the internet on forums and even found in books are quite wrong- not one of them will lead you to the correct tree.

Now that G.R.I.M. has the location of the actual Devil’s Tree and permission from Parks & Recreation, we are going to proceed with an overnight investigation of the location.

Things You Don’t Always Think About

Some of the reports of activity at Oak Hammock Park center around the restrooms.  Specifically, the women’s restroom.  The reports range from people hearing voices and screams to slamming doors.  An investigation in a public restroom presents numerous problems- installing camera equipment in a ladies restroom might score G.R.I.M. an interesting rap sheet, but most likely wouldn’t turn up any evidence.  While audio equipment might not land us behind bars, we can’t help but wonder if the men on the team really want to monitor the sounds and discussions in a women’s restroom.  Probably not.

Those issues to the side,  this particular restroom has some interesting things to note. The floor is far from level and there are open screened window cutouts along the roof-line.   This could account for nearly all of the phenomenon reported in the location- a stray breeze causing one of the stall doors to slam, voices carrying in through the open windows- even the screams could be rather common place, due to its proximity to the children’s playground.

As we continue to work on the Devil’s Tree Investigation, we will report our findings.

 Paranormal posted an interesting comment on our Survey blog page (on I Am Haunted) that led me to this article:

Paranormal beliefs linked to brain chemistry 09:15 27 July 2002

“Whether or not you believe in the paranormal may depend entirely on your brain chemistry. People with high levels of dopamine are more likely to find significance in coincidences, and pick out meaning and patterns where there are none.

Peter Brugger, a neurologist from the University Hospital in Zurich, Switzerland, has suggested before that people who believe in the paranormal often seem to be more willing to see patterns or relationships between events where sceptics perceive nothing.”

That article in turn led me to another, which was published in The New York Times. Here is a clip:

“They are eerie sensations, more common than one might think: A man describes feeling a shadowy figure standing behind him, then turning around to find no one there. A woman feels herself leaving her body and floating in space, looking down on her corporeal self.

Such experiences are often attributed by those who have them to paranormal forces.

But according to recent work by neuroscientists, they can be induced by delivering mild electric current to specific spots in the brain. In one woman, for example, a zap to a brain region called the angular gyrus resulted in a sensation that she was hanging from the ceiling, looking down at her body. In another woman, electrical current delivered to the angular gyrus produced an uncanny feeling that someone was behind her, intent on interfering with her actions.

Dr. Olaf Blanke, a neurologist at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland who carried out the procedures, said that the women had normal psychiatric histories and that they were stunned by the bizarre nature of their experiences.

The Sept. 21 issue of Nature magazine includes an account by Dr. Blanke and his colleagues of the woman who sensed a shadow person behind her. They described the out-of-body experiences in the February 2004 issue of the journal Brain.

There is nothing mystical about these ghostly experiences, said Peter Brugger, a neuroscientist at University Hospital in Zurich, who was not involved in the experiments but is an expert on phantom limbs, the sensation of still feeling a limb that has been amputated, and other mind-bending phenomena.

“The research shows that the self can be detached from the body and can live a phantom existence on its own, as in an out-of-body experience, or it can be felt outside of personal space, as in a sense of a presence,” Dr. Brugger said.”

This leads to some rather interesting questions; do these scientific discoveries make you less of a believer in the paranormal or more? Do you think that what is paranormal to some or most of the population is normal to another percentage, those whose brains act differently? Is this all ‘imaginary,’ just a byproduct of consciousness? If the consciousness can indeed separate itself, is it possible that others can see or interact with it despite its non-physical state?

In addition to the original article, I came across the book, “Possible Health Effects of Exposure to Residential Electric and Magnetic Fields” which was published by the National Research Council and has the following description:

“Assesses the effects of electric and magnetic fields on human health. This book examines what is known about three kinds of health effects associated with EMF: cancer, primarily childhood leukemia; reproduction and development; and neurobiological effects. It provides a discussion on hazard identification, and dose-response assessment.”

Their conclusion was that “the current body of evidence does not show that exposure to these fields presents a human health hazard. Specifically, no conclusive and consistent evidence shows that exposures to residential electric and magnetic fields produce cancer, adverse neurobehavioral effects, or reproductive and developmental effects.”

**** This is where I’m going to get a little more technical…this is a bail out point for anyone not interested in the ‘science stuff’! ****

In a June 2006 publication, Jan Bures of the Institute of Physiology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic in Prague, Czech Republic reported the following:

Unlike environmental diseases due to presence of toxic or absence of vitally important substances in food, water or air, electrical and magnetic forces are indispensable for life at levels considerably exceeding the limits considered as harmful by the EHS concept.

One of the underlying misunderstandings is the assumption that EMFs are novel forces introduced by technical  development of industrial countries and that living creatures are not prepared to live with them. However, already the first unicellular organisms starting the evolution of life on our planet were marvelous examples of electrical engineering. Their lipid cell membrane is only 5nm thick but separates an electrical potential of 0.1 V, which corresponds to the electrical field of 10-1V/5×10-9m = 2×107 V/m. Electrical phenomena have played an essential role in development of animals and particularly of their brains, the function of which is impossible without electrical signals mediating transmission of information between individual neurons and neural  networks, and implementing the highest cognitive functions.

Up to 1011 neurons of the human brain generate a large amount of electrical activity, which in its diversity, intensity and ubiquity exceeds what most alleged sources can produce.”

She further explains:

“The requirement that electrical phenomena generated in the brain tissue by external sources, should not exceed the inherent level of EMF noise of biological origin seems reasonable and is generally strictly followed by hygienic regulations for the use of electrical appliances. But this is not always respected in some medical treatments, when higher stimulation intensity is deliberately used to restore a failing vital function. Thus cardiac flutter blocking blood circulation can be stopped by high intensity electrical pulse applied to the chest, which elicits cardiac arrest usually followed by recovery of normal heart beat.

A less dramatic example is the cardiac pacemaker, implanted stimulator which cures patients with atrio-ventricular blockade by replacing the irregular discharge of the cardiac sinus node by electrical stimuli activating the heart contractions at regular intervals. The same applies to stimulation of various brain centers, which may elicit in animals pleasant feelings, motivating them to press a switch administering a short (0.1 s) electric stimulus (about 40 ?A) to the hypothalamic pleasure centers (Olds and Milner, 1954).

High preference of this artificial activity against other motivated behaviors e.g. (feeding, drinking) shows that the nature of the stimulus does not interfere with its further processing and does not prevent the animal to use the cognitive functions required for access to the rewarding stimulation. Similar desirable effects of brain stimulation were recently demonstrated in Parkinson patients, whose tremor, rigidity, muscle weakness and difficult walking are clearly alleviated by self-administered series of pulses applied through implanted electrodes to their thalamic nuclei (Hashimoto et al., 2003)

Electrical stimulation requires application of higher voltages and currents produced by technical devices, but biological forms of effective stimulators were introduced by the evolutionary process millions years ago. Several classes of electric fish have developed so called electric organs, in which hundreds to thousands cells are connected in series to a column in which the 0.1 V emf of individual cells may lead to the discharge amplitude of 100 V to 700 V, and by parallel connection of such columns to currents of up to 10 A (Grundfest, 1960). While the strongly electric fish (the electric eel, Electrophorus electricus), use their discharge for stunning the prey or for predator defense, the weakly electric fish use it for electrolocation.

In Gnathonemus Petersii the electric organ discharges low rate of 10 V pulses from the tail. Current flows through the electroreceptors on the anterior surface of the body, innervated by the lateral line nerves, which monitor the density of current flow through the surrounding water in the rostrocaudal direction. Any asymmetry of this density shows that the conductivity of the water was influenced by presence of some objects with high or low resistance in the vicinity of the fish. Electro-sensitivity is also used by some non-electric fish like sharks, for detection of electric current in the environment, e.g. for finding live prey buried under a layer of sand. Sharks can detect electrocardiogram of such fish, remove the covering sand and eat the prey. The development of electrolocation demonstrates, that evolution has tried a variety of available methods to improve the animal’s capacity to locate prey, or avoid obstacles in the environment in which the animal lives, but which cannot be detected with effective use of vision or touch. Limited contact with aquatic environment did not lead to development of an analog of the lateral line system in humans. But the most important lesson we get from electric fishes, is that they were not deterred by the mysterious force and used it ingeniously to their advantage. It is obvious that they do not obey the simplistic recommendations of environmentalists, prohibiting the use of high voltage and current which would make evolution a very safe but rather ineffective process.

In an interesting side study conducted by Eugene Lyskov, Kjell Hansson Mild and Monica Sandström (from the Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Gävle, Umeå, Sweden; the National Institute for Working Life, Umeå, Sweden and the Department of Natural Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden, respectivly) we see that certain people have a varying baseline that affects results:

“We have during several years studied people with perceived electrical hypersensitivity (EHS), both in epidemiological studies and in neurophysiological examinations. [...]

The problem to find a causal connection between the originate of symptoms and electromagnetic fields in provocation tests, have lead us in to new line of thought. How do people with EHS respond to other physical factors in our environment? What are their physiological and neurophysiologic baseline status?

Since amplitude modulated light emitted from the video display units (VDU) was considered as a possible cause of EHS symptoms, the aim of our first study (Sandström et al. 1997) was to make an objective physiological assessment of individual sensitivity to this factor. It is known that brain and retina reactions to flickers, can be recorded far above critical fusion frequency. Therefore, amplitude of electroretinogram (ERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) during photo stimulation at frequencies below and above CFF was chosen as markers of the sensitivity. Additionally, heart rate was recorded to control possible activation due to photo stimulation session. We tested 10 people with perceived EHS and an equal number of age and sex matched healthy controls.

The results showed significantly increased amplitude of the VEP at all tested frequencies in the patient group in comparison with a healthy control group, whereas no difference in ERG were revealed. Increased mean heart rate in rest (baseline) period was also found when comparing the patient group with the control group. These preliminary findings indicated an increased sensitivity to flickering light, and possible engagement of the autonomous nervous system in the patients. That motivated further investigations of the baseline  neurophysiological characteristics of the central and autonomous regulation, and their reactivity to different functional tests in EHS. Therefore in our second study (Lyskov et al. 2001a), the arsenal of physiological methods, and tests as well as the number of patients was extended.

Twenty patients with prevalence of skin (tingling, redness) and neurasthenic (fatigue, tiredness, headache) symptoms were recruited from the University hospital, age and sex matched with twenty control subjects without health complaints. They were examined in a one day laboratory session, that included recording of electroencephalogram, steadystate visual potentials in response to stroboscope stimulation at frequencies 30-70 Hz, ECG, blood pressure, and electrodermal activity. Subjective measure of sensitivity to flickering light – critical fusion frequency was recorded in response to manually controlled matrix of the red light emitting diodes. Vision acuity and contrast sensitivity were also assessed. After acclimatization in the experimental chamber physiological processes were recorded in baseline conditions and in response to several functional tests: deep breathing test, orthostatic test, audiostimulation. The total duration of the test battery was 25 minutes, with at least 5 minutes pauses between functional tests. Differences between EHS subjects and control were found in several experimental outcomes. The patients had a higher mean value of critical fusion frequency, modest but significantly increased amplitude of the fundamental harmonics of the steady-state VEP in occipital derivations in patients in comparison with control subjects. The overall difference, was detected with all autonomous variables used in the experiments. In rest conditions mean values of heart rate was higher and heart rate variability lower in EHS persons in comparison with control. Decreased 30:15 ratio in response to orthostatic test was detected on the level of statistical trend. Sympathetic skin response to audio clicks showed increased amplitude, decreased latency and relative asymmetry of responses in patients in comparison with control.

The results of this neurophysiological study showed that patients with a perceived electrical hypersensitivity, had a tendency towards increased sympathetic activity during baseline relaxation period, hyper responsiveness to sensor stimulation such as flickering light and audio stimulation, and their physiological profile showed imbalance of autonomic regulation with a trend towards hypersympathotone and increased arousal.”

This does indeed lead one to wonder how these predisposed individuals would react to random waves under less than desirable conditions (such as when alone or in the dark). It could indeed account for the paranormal experiences.  However, it is my opinion that it does not seem to address the validity of the experience, only the origin.

Reviewing images caught by our cameras while doing an investigation can be highly subjective; however, we try to look for the obvious reasons behind anything that seems out of the ordinary. We have posted several anomaly images in the past; these are the items we simply can not say are one thing or another- their cause, while possibly something we see daily without noticing, remains unknown.

So now its your turn to interpret the evidence. How good are YOUR eyes?

Can you tell us which one is a confirmed raindrop? What do you think the other two are?

We would really appreciate it if you could take part in this survey- and tell everyone you know to do the same! It’s very simple. Just answer these few questions:

Have you ever seen a ghost? (Actually SEEN one- not felt, heard, sensed, etc)

Now for the fun part-

Which way is the dancer spinning? (Clockwise or counter clockwise)

Can you make her change direction?

That’s it! Thanks for taking part.

This afternoon I was discussing Oak Hammock Park with a city employee and was saddened to hear about the trouble they have had in the area. It seems that the curiosity of some individuals has overcome their common sense, leading to multiple incidents of trespass and even property damage. Because of the situation, Parks and Recreation has been forced to hire night staff, install cameras to monitor the area and to even contact the police when those who do not belong are found on the grounds.

Oak Hammock Park is a dangerous place at night; it is easy to become lost on the trails and there is always the concern of meeting up with a ‘worldly’ creature such as an alligator (or any other number of wild animals). It is also breaking the law to enter the property without proper permission from those in charge.

The truth of the matter is that by illegally entering the property, you are doing more harm than good to the entire area of paranormal investigation.

Please do not break the law in your attempts to satisfy your curiosity over the Devil’s Tree. We can not stress this enough.

Location History

Old Fort Park is the site of Fort Pierce, a military installation constructed by the U.S. Army in Florida with the purpose of being a main supply depot for the army during the Second Seminole War. During the Second Seminole War (1835-1842), the U.S. Army began setting up military posts throughout the state of Florida. In 1837 Col. Benjamin K. Pierce (brother to the future 14th president) was sent down the Indian River from St. Augustine, charged with finding a location to build a base for operations in the area. Finding a fresh water spring, he chose his spot on a bluff overlooking the Indian River Lagoon. A year later, he built a fort out of palmetto trees.

Col. Pierce and his men were far from the first residents in the area, though the town is named after him. In fact, the fort itself was constructed near an ancient burial mound of the Ais Indians.

The mound is several hundred feet around, and a series of stone steps takes you to the top, where there is a beautiful view of the Indian River, named after the Ais. Although the Ais died out 250 years before the fort was built- long before the Seminoles migrated south from Alabama and Georgia- the survival of their structure compared to the vanishing of the soldiers’ fort, which burned to the ground in the 1840s, is quite remarkable.

Investigation Summary

While we had personal experiences at the Fort, the documentation does not prove or disprove those experiences.  The incident with the scratches remains inexplicable.  At this point, we feel that further exploration of the Old Fort Park would yield similar results to our three expeditions. Until we are capable of returning with a larger team of investigators and additional equipment, we are forced to call this investigation inconclusive.

To read the investigation summaries as they were written and to review the evidence, use the following links:

Old Fort Park, Final Investigation

Incident At The Old Fort

Back To The Old Fort

Old Fort Investigation, Round 1

Investigation Images

Now that we’ve concluded the investigation of the Old Fort, we thought we’d ask you where you think we should go next. If you have a suggestion, feel free to add it. Remember, though, that inappropriate responses will be deleted.

This afternoon I met a friend and her young son downtown for lunch. We enjoyed our meal along the water front as we caught up on the goings on in our lives. During the conversation, we began discussing the Old Fort Park. Curious, she asked if I would take her over there, as it is only a few minutes from where we were. We packed up and headed to the park.

I walked with her, taking her around the front of the mound, then up to the top. After that, we walked back down the mound and went around the southern end, coming out at the western center of the park. During this walk she told me she felt as if she were being watched (I did as well) and at one point even felt nauseated.

We then headed over to the area of the odd planting in the middle of the palms; this is the same location at which I’d had the odd feeling the last time we’d been there at night. I held the baby as she walked between two trees and headed towards the mound. As she passed between the trees, she appeared to stumble. There were no roots, no protruding branches. Coming over to stand next to me, she explained that she’d felt as if the ground suddenly ‘sank’, had a sense of vertigo and felt as if she’d been pushed. At this point, her young son looked at the trees and began waving, saying “Hi”.

We finished up our visit, with her declaring that the Old Fort Park gave her the creeps even in the daylight and headed our own ways. Shortly afterwards, she sent me this message:

“When i got in the car and got onto Indian River Drive, I continued to feel like I was being watched; almost like something hitched a ride. I didn’t feel scared or freaked or anything, but my little guy kept saying HI HI HI and waving. As I turned at Midway Road, I felt like my arm was burning. At the same time, my ears popped and the baby started screaming- like something had scared the heck out of him; he was bright red in the face. I looked down and saw I’d been scratched on my arm. As soon as I felt the scratch, the feeling of being watched was gone, but I felt really scared. When we got home, I tried to put the little guy down for a nap, but he won’t go to sleep- he’s still obviously upset.”

I can’t confirm or deny the incident that took place in the car, but I can tell you that while we were at the park she did not come into contact with anything that would have caused the injuries pictured in the images below.  The first two images were taken only moments after the scratches appeared; the others were taken a little over an hour and a half later.